From the review of 7723711:
- The assembler is locked: a client closed for a full queue is closed
by the task that was sending, loop(), whose disconnect dropped the
buffer while async_tcp could be copying into it. A whole message is
taken out of it, so a disconnect can't free it while it is read.
- loop() expires a message stalled for 10 s, freeing its buffer and
telling its client, instead of holding it until another client came.
A binary message is refused before it can touch another's buffer.
- Each edit takes only the fields its route reads; one it would ignore
is refused by name. linkRemote's rolling code goes in under the
route's name, so applyModelEdit is unchanged again.
- An edit refused for an id that doesn't exist replies not found
(edit_result_t::missing). A reply that doesn't fit its buffer goes
as an internal error, so the op still gets one.
- The TYPE table says what becomes of each op (proto_op_t), which the
socket switches on. The reply address is one proto_reply_to_t. The
routes and the ops start and queue an edit the same way
(newModelEdit, submitModelEdit). The full-list texts and the offered
remote address rule live in ModelEditor.
- e2e: the sort order test skips a list that it would renumber.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
8fa087aa89