From the review of 7723711:
- The assembler is locked: a client closed for a full queue is closed
by the task that was sending, loop(), whose disconnect dropped the
buffer while async_tcp could be copying into it. A whole message is
taken out of it, so a disconnect can't free it while it is read.
- loop() expires a message stalled for 10 s, freeing its buffer and
telling its client, instead of holding it until another client came.
A binary message is refused before it can touch another's buffer.
- Each edit takes only the fields its route reads; one it would ignore
is refused by name. linkRemote's rolling code goes in under the
route's name, so applyModelEdit is unchanged again.
- An edit refused for an id that doesn't exist replies not found
(edit_result_t::missing). A reply that doesn't fit its buffer goes
as an internal error, so the op still gets one.
- The TYPE table says what becomes of each op (proto_op_t), which the
socket switches on. The reply address is one proto_reply_to_t. The
routes and the ops start and queue an edit the same way
(newModelEdit, submitModelEdit). The full-list texts and the offered
remote address rule live in ModelEditor.
- e2e: the sort order test skips a list that it would renumber.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The edit routes become ops 26-44 (addRoom ... groupSortOrder): ProtoEdits
turns an op's payload into the route's request, full names and real
booleans, and loop() applies it with applyModelEdit() as the route
does. The reply goes to the client that sent it, with an add's new id,
or the route's reason and a shade's validation code; the HTTP routes
keep sending requestResult.
getNextRoom, getNextShade, getNextGroup and groupOptions (45-48) are
answered by loop() from the shade model, through a new LoopQueue item.
Messages that arrive in pieces, a frame over one TCP segment or several
frames, are put back together by ProtoAssembly: one at a time across
clients, up to 4 KB, in a buffer held only while one is on its way.
A message in pieces is now told from its first frame's opcode, which
also stops a fragmented message's last frame drawing a second reply.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
